Reference for Bava Batra 240:8

זה הדבר דשחוטי חוץ מיבעי ליה על השוחט הוא חייב ואינו חייב על המולק זה הדבר דראשי המטות מיבעי ליה לחכם מתיר ואין בעל מתיר בעל מפר ואין חכם מפר

[It has been said: 'Just as here [it was spoken to] the heads of the tribes, so there [it was spoken to] the heads of the tribes'. In [respect of] what law [has this comparison been made]?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' What connection could there be between the law of animals slaughtered outside the Temple and the heads of tribes. ');">²⁷</span> — R. Shesheth said: To infer [that] the law of absolution<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Heb. [H] lit., 'question'. ');">²⁸</span> [is applicable] to consecrated objects.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As a qualified scholar may annul a vow, so he may render absolution from the consecration of an object, if the person who consecrated it can produce sufficient grounds to justify the absolution. ');">²⁹</span> According to Beth Shammai, however, who maintains [that] the law of absolution<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Heb. [H] lit., 'question'. ');">²⁸</span>

Explore reference for Bava Batra 240:8. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.